Comments on: Learn http://www.chrisbrenton.org Your source for invisible security bug spray Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:22:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Jeremy http://www.chrisbrenton.org/learn/comment-page-1/#comment-3230 Jeremy Wed, 09 Jun 2010 22:01:59 +0000 http://www.chrisbrenton.org/?page_id=226#comment-3230 Chris, I took SEC502 in 2006 and just Re-Certified. Got the new books and WOW! The material has changed a bit. Many more labs that I'm looking forward to trying out. Thanks for creating this course. It's been invaluable for me as an infosec pro. Chris,

I took SEC502 in 2006 and just Re-Certified. Got the new books and WOW! The material has changed a bit. Many more labs that I’m looking forward to trying out. Thanks for creating this course. It’s been invaluable for me as an infosec pro.

]]> By: Steve http://www.chrisbrenton.org/learn/comment-page-1/#comment-369 Steve Wed, 07 Oct 2009 23:38:07 +0000 http://www.chrisbrenton.org/?page_id=226#comment-369 Scott Hogg at rmv6tf.org may be a good resource; he authored the latest Cisco Press book on IPV6 security, and regularly contributes to Network World as a guest columnist. Maybe not vendor-nuetral, but he's been giving presentations on IPV6 since before it was trendy. Scott Hogg at rmv6tf.org may be a good resource; he authored the latest Cisco Press book on IPV6 security, and regularly contributes to Network World as a guest columnist. Maybe not vendor-nuetral, but he’s been giving presentations on IPV6 since before it was trendy.

]]> By: Chris http://www.chrisbrenton.org/learn/comment-page-1/#comment-18 Chris Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:12:05 +0000 http://www.chrisbrenton.org/?page_id=226#comment-18 Hey jc, Nope, you didn't miss it in the 502 material. I was purposely vague as IPv6 is still somewhat in flux. The biggest problem is that "support for IPv6" means different things to different vendors. There's no real vetting process. Actually, your timing is pretty cool. I've noticed a lack of really good hands on IPv6 info. Everyone talks in general terms (like my own 502 material), but some actual demo stuff is badly needed. I've been bouncing around the idea of an IPv6 section to the site, I just know the research is going to be a real time suck. Let me see if I can address this for you over the next few weeks. Thanks! Chris Hey jc,

Nope, you didn’t miss it in the 502 material. I was purposely vague as IPv6 is still somewhat in flux. The biggest problem is that “support for IPv6″ means different things to different vendors. There’s no real vetting process.
Actually, your timing is pretty cool. I’ve noticed a lack of really good hands on IPv6 info. Everyone talks in general terms (like my own 502 material), but some actual demo stuff is badly needed. I’ve been bouncing around the idea of an IPv6 section to the site, I just know the research is going to be a real time suck. Let me see if I can address this for you over the next few weeks.

Thanks!
Chris

]]> By: jc http://www.chrisbrenton.org/learn/comment-page-1/#comment-17 jc Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:09:56 +0000 http://www.chrisbrenton.org/?page_id=226#comment-17 Chris, Sec 502 covered ipv6 but not really firewalling/restricting of ipv6 nor wire product assesment wrt ipv6. Would be good to see some safe practices around restricting ipv6 (including 6in4 tunnelling teredo etc) until an enterprise "decides" to deploy. (or if i completely missed that section in 502 please point me to the right book ;-)) thanks Chris,

Sec 502 covered ipv6 but not really firewalling/restricting of ipv6 nor wire product assesment wrt ipv6. Would be good to see some safe practices around restricting ipv6 (including 6in4 tunnelling teredo etc) until an enterprise “decides” to deploy. (or if i completely missed that section in 502 please point me to the right book ;-) )

thanks

]]>